40 plus suppliers were delivering to 17 plants and logistics depots
All flows were treated individually with little or no attempt to create synergistic networks flows
Significant sourcing inertia existed, most routes had been with the same supplier for many years
Suppliers were managed for price only, there were regular increases in price being accepted
Analysis
The client continued to use the threat of competition in the face of overwhelming evidence that switching was rare
Most sourcing decisions were driven by preference and prejudice (local issues)
Supplier management was handled, in the main, by time-pressured, unfocused production staff
Solution
A generic cost synthesis model was developed by a small central expert resource
This cost model was applied to four selected routes involving three suppliers. This identified initial potential savings of around 2 million SEK (10%)
Negotiations with those suppliers were conducted lead by the small central expert resource. Those negotiation results were communicated to all plant-based production staff involved in handling freight companies via a series of local seminars
The plant based staff then applied local "price-down" pressure to all their remaining suppliers using the original negotiation results as a benchmark and the generic cost synthesis as the rationale
Results
2.0m SEK (10%) immediate savings (four routes)
15m SEK further savings from the multiplier effect of the first negotiations
Actively demonstrated which suppliers were committed to developing their business with the client and had a cost structure that permitted them to do this
Created a platform from which to commence a more sophisticated strategic programme of flow/network management across all routes with the aim of creating a more responsiveness system with lower inventories